男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Convention not applicable

(China Daily) Updated: 2014-12-08 07:54

China has indisputable sovereignty over the South China Sea Islands (the Dongsha Islands, the Xisha Islands, the Zhongsha Islands and the Nansha Islands) and the adjacent waters. Since the 1970s, the Philippines has illegally occupied or laid claims to some maritime features of China in the South China Sea. In addition, the Philippines has also illegally explored and exploited the resources on those maritime features and in the adjacent maritime areas. The Philippines' activities mentioned above have violated the Charter of the United Nations and international law, and seriously encroached upon China's territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests. The Chinese Government has always been firmly opposed to these actions of the Philippines, and consistently made solemn representations and protests to the Philippines.

The Philippines has summarized its claims for arbitration in three categories: First, China's assertion of the "historic rights" in the South China Sea is inconsistent with the Convention; Second, China's claim to entitlements, based on certain rocks, low-tide elevations and submerged features in the South China Sea, of 200 nautical miles and more, is inconsistent with the Convention. Third, China has unlawfully interfered with the Philippines' enjoyment and exercise of its rights under the Convention.

With regard to the first category of claims, it is obvious that the core of those claims is that China's maritime claims in the South China Sea have exceeded the extend allowed under the Convention. However, it is a general principle of international law that sovereignty over land territory is the basis for the determination of maritime rights. Only after the extent of China's territorial sovereignty in the South China Sea is determined can a decision be made on the extent of China's maritime claims in the South China Sea. As to the second category of claims, China believes that the nature and maritime entitlements of certain maritime features in the South China Sea cannot be considered in isolation from the issue of sovereignty. Regarding the third category of claims, China maintains that, based on its sovereignty over relevant maritime features and the maritime rights derived therefrom, China's relevant activities in the South China Sea are both lawful and justified. The Philippines claims that China's actions have encroached upon areas under its jurisdiction. Before this claim can be decided upon, sovereignty over the relevant maritime features must be ascertained and maritime delimitation completed.

Most Viewed Today's Top News
Considering money as the end is the tragedy
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 宜宾县| 姜堰市| 合阳县| 涞源县| 汶川县| 托克逊县| 辉南县| 三河市| 凤庆县| 永登县| 常山县| 南漳县| 宣恩县| 云安县| 炎陵县| 宁明县| 太仆寺旗| 静乐县| 金昌市| 莫力| 桂平市| 阜宁县| 崇仁县| 锦州市| 蒙山县| 留坝县| 永和县| 遂昌县| 德庆县| 唐山市| 自贡市| 宁陕县| 皋兰县| 仪陇县| 长泰县| 武平县| 太保市| 苏州市| 彭阳县| 化德县| 嘉兴市| 松潘县| 临江市| 兴安盟| 沙河市| 安岳县| 随州市| 秦皇岛市| 石柱| 台东县| 武定县| 湖口县| 富源县| 泗洪县| 武穴市| 临汾市| 定陶县| 德令哈市| 浦江县| 丹寨县| 晋州市| 建阳市| 肥西县| 察隅县| 防城港市| 道孚县| 松潘县| 武宣县| 松原市| 容城县| 米泉市| 扬中市| 巴马| 和田县| 鞍山市| 黄冈市| 宁陕县| 平罗县| 页游| 壤塘县| 新泰市| 曲靖市|