男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Convention not applicable

(China Daily) Updated: 2014-12-08 07:54

By requesting the Arbitral Tribunal to apply the Convention to determine the extent of China's maritime rights in the South China Sea, without first having ascertained sovereignty over the relevant maritime features, and by formulating a series of claims for arbitration to that effect, the Philippines contravenes the general principles of international law and international jurisprudence on the settlement of international maritime disputes. To decide upon any of the Philippines' claims, the Arbitral Tribunal would inevitably have to determine, directly or indirectly, the issue of territorial sovereignty over both the maritime features in question and other maritime features in the South China Sea. Besides, such a decision would unavoidably produce, in practical terms, the effect of a maritime delimitation. The issue of territorial sovereignty falls beyond the purview of the Convention. China maintains that the Arbitral Tribunal manifestly has no jurisdiction over the present case.

III.

There exists an agreement between China and the Philippines to settle their disputes in the South China Sea through negotiation, and the Philippines is debarred from unilaterally initiating compulsory arbitration.

With regard to disputes concerning territorial sovereignty and maritime rights, China has always maintained that they should be peacefully resolved through negotiation between the countries directly concerned. In the present case, there has been a long-standing agreement between China and the Philippines on resolving their disputes in the South China Sea through friendly consultation and negotiation.

A series of bilateral instruments between China and the Philippines make it clear that both sides agree or undertake to resolve their disputes in the South China Sea by friendly consultation and negotiation. And the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea ("DOC"), signed by both China and the Philippines, explicitly states that territorial and jurisdictional disputes shall be resolved peacefully by sovereign States directly concerned through friendly consultations and negotiations.

The relevant provisions in those bilateral instruments and the DOC are mutually reinforcing and form an agreement between China and the Philippines. On that basis, they have undertaken a mutual obligation to settle their relevant disputes through negotiations and have excluded any other means of settlement. In these circumstances, according to the provisions of Article 280, 281 and others of the Convention, the relevant disputes between the two States shall be resolved through negotiations and there shall be no recourse to arbitration or other compulsory procedures.

Most Viewed Today's Top News
Considering money as the end is the tragedy
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 莒南县| 乌兰察布市| 蓬溪县| 明光市| 昌乐县| 石阡县| 贺州市| 内乡县| 鲜城| 偃师市| 华安县| 邻水| 镇江市| 德昌县| 临澧县| 大同市| 临邑县| 如皋市| 安岳县| 资中县| 莆田市| 东明县| 大同市| 东山县| 东乌| 满城县| 山东省| 汝阳县| 黄梅县| 莱西市| 霍州市| 阿瓦提县| 长春市| 衡阳县| 涟源市| 富民县| 敦煌市| 大关县| 桐乡市| 特克斯县| 钟山县| 遂宁市| 开原市| 星子县| 利辛县| 东明县| 依兰县| 翁源县| 西平县| 余干县| 长泰县| 赤峰市| 天全县| 京山县| 静安区| 平原县| 肃宁县| 江西省| 丰宁| 沭阳县| 东至县| 广水市| 新河县| 南陵县| 彭泽县| 宿松县| 咸阳市| 平谷区| 富源县| 离岛区| 揭西县| 沾化县| 永年县| 鄯善县| 万宁市| 北辰区| 鹰潭市| 敖汉旗| 镇赉县| 鄂托克前旗| 璧山县| 巩留县|