男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Population policy change needs more moves

By Stuart Basten (China Daily) Updated: 2015-01-14 08:33

In 2012, the State Council-funded China Development Research Foundation advocated a three-step reform process: an immediate geographically selective two-child policy, a national two-child policy by 2015, and the removal of all constraints by 2020. At the moment, the reform timetable still seems achievable. But will such changes have much effect?

Evidence seems to suggest that the family planning policy alone is no longer responsible for the dropping fertility rate; other social and economic factors are playing a major role. For a start, we need to see children as social goods and not just as future producers and consumers. In this way, we can try to develop a society which is more broadly supportive of parents and children both. This will require thinking about not just family policies as such, but much broadly about, for example, funding for education, planning and housing policy, the burden of care for older people placed upon couples and so on.

A final thought is that we need to move the conversation on from a fear of a "demographic time bomb" of low fertility, declining population and so-called rapid aging. China's population - both younger and older people - is healthier and better educated than ever. The Chinese economy is more efficient and technologically advanced than ever. And urbanization and the technological revolution have made China an ever more connected and integrated economy.

In this context, the raw numbers of people are arguably less important than the sum of their skills, their health, their education, their work and their families. Instead of being frightened about demographic change, we just need to set about making a better society for all through comprehensive, integrated social reform. Having said that, better support for the (rural) elderly people and ensuring inclusive economic development and innovation must be seen as immediate priorities.

The author is an associate professor in Social Policy, Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 砚山县| 连城县| 芮城县| 新竹县| 呼玛县| 玉树县| 温泉县| 苏州市| 闻喜县| 哈密市| 九江县| 义乌市| 徐水县| 苍溪县| 南乐县| 方山县| 衡东县| 伊通| 烟台市| 鄂托克旗| 博爱县| 新绛县| 十堰市| 叶城县| 克什克腾旗| 壶关县| 娱乐| 当雄县| 武冈市| 泰兴市| 敖汉旗| 阿克苏市| 都匀市| 明溪县| 龙胜| 栖霞市| 阿拉尔市| 广宗县| 定西市| 盐山县| 濉溪县| 昂仁县| 三都| 南充市| 临夏市| 南丹县| 辽宁省| 洛扎县| 周口市| 搜索| 新蔡县| 青冈县| 桂阳县| 咸丰县| 阿克苏市| 蚌埠市| 通化县| 巫溪县| 隆昌县| 分宜县| 汤阴县| 赤水市| 通许县| 甘南县| 江口县| 五原县| 扶风县| 霍山县| 楚雄市| 句容市| 辉县市| 云南省| 秀山| 千阳县| 拜城县| 息烽县| 梁平县| 普安县| 宁陵县| 和田县| 淮南市| 潞西市|