男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

APEC: Genuine collectivism and effective connectivity

By Sergey V. Lavrov | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2016-11-18 11:01

Today, there are over 150 bilateral and multilateral free trade agreements in the APEC region. A joint strategic study has been undertaken on issues related to the realization of a Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific. Its participants have not yet agreed upon the optimal format and operational parameters of the FTAAP. However, they have already drawn the main conclusion that it is necessary to equally take into account the experience of all regional integration associations without exception, including the APEC Economic Community, the Pacific Alliance and the Eurasian Economic Union. For our part, we are convinced that only constructive interaction on a transparent and non-discriminatory basis to link these associations would allow to avoid the risks of crisis in the world trade aggravation and broader use of best regulatory practices.

The Russian initiative on the Greater Eurasian Partnership is primarily aimed at attaining these objectives. Its implementation is intended to harmonize the emerging Eurasian multilevel system of integration structures and to combine the potential of the interested Asian countries and in the future – of Europe as well. This means establishing cooperative relations on a bilateral and multilateral basis in order to find effective sources of growth, looking for new opportunities for the development and promotion of common standards for regulating trade and investment, as well as responding to major technological challenges.

We envisage an important role in the implementation of this initiative for the Eurasian Economic Union, which is steadily establishing itself as the leading mechanism of integration in Eurasia and is able to become a link between various processes and associations within the framework of the common trade and economic space.

The task of ensuring qualitative growth as a new standard for global progress is another priority on the regional agenda. Within the framework of the forum, it is solved in line with the implementation of the APEC Growth Strategy endorsed by the leaders in 2010. The document focuses on balanced, sustainable, inclusive, innovative and secure growth. The attention is concentrated on measures to promote equitable and comprehensive development, as well as the construction of a coherent, deeply integrated and interconnected regional community.

In this context, the improvement of transport and logistics infrastructure in the region should have an important role. Russia has a wealth of experience in ensuring reliable, continuous and cost-effective operation of global value chains and the compatibility of production and distribution networks. The geography should be taken into account as well – the shortest goods delivery routes between Asia and Europe pass through the territory of our country.

In order to make full use of its transit capacity, Russia has been consistently pursuing the policy of national transport infrastructure development. The government is supporting major projects of upgrading the Baikal Amur Mainline and Trans Siberian Railway. Development of the Far East port complex is underway. Infrastructure of Khabarovsk and Vladivostok airports is being improved with a view to turn them into major hubs of transcontinental air transportation. Active use of the Northern Sea Route may benefit business.

At the same time measures are taken to technologically upgrade border and customs services in order to enable much accelerated passing of the relevant procedures both for cargo, including large containers, and for passengers. We attach great significance to enhancing the safety of transport infrastructure, including through the use of the Global Navigation Satellite System (GLONASS).

Russia advocates implementing innovations in all domains. Vigorous technological progress, particularly in information and telecommunications technology and the emerging new markets require coordinated actions aimed at implementing effective structural reforms.

Russia proposed the concept of "electronic economy" at the Forum. This refers to a new technological pattern that goes beyond "digital economy" and "Internet economy". We believe time has come for the APEC to develop new decisions on such issues as regulation of electronic data sets, including classified information protection measures, development of legal and administrative framework for enhancing cross-border e commerce cooperation that would build people's trust in electronic space.

Our country supports the APEC efforts to develop human capital. We attach priority to this area of joint efforts aimed at strengthening regional connectivity. A favourable environment for the full realization of each person's creative abilities is an indispensable precondition for successful social and economic progress.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 二连浩特市| 邯郸市| 安仁县| 英山县| 涡阳县| 景德镇市| 承德县| 郎溪县| 鄂托克旗| 新巴尔虎左旗| 昔阳县| 保靖县| 峨边| 鹿泉市| 蚌埠市| 澎湖县| 县级市| 兴和县| 丰城市| 竹北市| 襄城县| 安溪县| 江都市| 澄江县| 开平市| 侯马市| 湘潭市| 多伦县| 洪江市| 峨眉山市| 察雅县| 含山县| 漳浦县| 天全县| 丹江口市| 黑山县| 宿州市| 廊坊市| 包头市| 措勤县| 镇宁| 保康县| 卫辉市| 奎屯市| 湖南省| 阳朔县| 大安市| 广水市| 合阳县| 三都| 萍乡市| 曲阜市| 双柏县| 和硕县| 吉林省| 连山| 河北区| 江达县| 通化县| 临城县| 长葛市| 武川县| 蕉岭县| 穆棱市| 娄烦县| 全椒县| 临颍县| 丽江市| 新乐市| 汉沽区| 堆龙德庆县| 卓资县| 客服| 犍为县| 犍为县| 松潘县| 辰溪县| 石门县| 英吉沙县| 涡阳县| 宁津县| 乌鲁木齐县|