男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Unappealing side effects of sharing economy

China Daily | Updated: 2017-04-06 07:06

Unappealing side effects of sharing economy

More than 4,000 illegal parking bicycles impounded by authorities in Shanghai, March 1, 2017. [Photo/VCG]

LARGE NUMBERS OF TOURISTS flocked to Shenzhen Bay Park in Guangdong province on Monday using bikes they rented via bike-sharing service apps such as Mobike. There were so many cyclists that they blocked most of the bike lanes in the park and caused great inconvenience to other visitors. Southern Metropolis Daily commented on Wednesday:

A glance at the congested bike lanes in Shenzhen Bay Park would be enough to give people goose bumps. During the three-day Tomb Sweeping Day travel rush that ended on Tuesday, an average of 300,000 tourists visited the park each day, many of them riding station-less sharing bikes.

The influx of enthusiastic riders made park management difficult, as randomly parked bikes turned the beach bike lane into a makeshift parking lot. That explains why after the influx of cyclists on Monday, sharing bikes were forbidden to enter the park grounds the next day.

The rise of the sharing economy has been applauded, but the side effects are beginning to emerge. The parking chaos at Shenzhen Bay Park is but one example, but it will not be the last, as more bikes hit the road and management of them struggles to keep up.

Despite the increasing popularity of the bike-hire services, service providers have to make sure their bikes do not impose a burden on social governance.

It is laudable that several bike-sharing service companies have sought to cooperate with the Shenzhen government after their bikes flooded into the park, in an attempt to make amends. And their success in keeping most riders at bay the next day means that efficient management is possible if preemptive measures are taken and notice given in advance.

On its part, the Shenzhen government should have anticipated the trouble caused by the unlimited entry of bikes into the park. Although it is making progress in managing the sharing bikes, it has a lot more to do to help sharing bikes become an integral part of urban life. Specific boundaries have to be drawn with regard to where bikes can be left by their users.

Ultimately, a consensus needs to be reached among local governments, bike-hire companies, and customers that they have a shared interest in managing the use of such bikes. Whether the bike-sharing services will thrive hinges on flexible governmental guidance, the self-discipline of users, and the bike providers' efforts to hold unruly users to account.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 江陵县| 全州县| 广宁县| 山阳县| 永登县| 吉林市| 临安市| 高雄市| 曲靖市| 凯里市| 广昌县| 崇州市| 临西县| 垣曲县| 呼伦贝尔市| 榆树市| 阳山县| 东源县| 毕节市| 西华县| 连州市| 开原市| 金华市| 英超| 东平县| 郸城县| 龙川县| 工布江达县| 兴宁市| 皋兰县| 河北区| 桓台县| 哈尔滨市| 铁力市| 富蕴县| 古浪县| 巴彦淖尔市| 松桃| 靖远县| 玉树县| 开封县| 清原| 宝山区| 驻马店市| 昔阳县| 象山县| 平原县| 徐闻县| 安龙县| 平舆县| 桐乡市| 桑植县| 青神县| 许昌市| 杭锦后旗| 连南| 新田县| 乌苏市| 娄烦县| 泗水县| 绥阳县| 海兴县| 乐东| 绥德县| 沧源| 遂川县| 广东省| 霍城县| 合水县| 平江县| 屏南县| 桦甸市| 方城县| 康马县| 新巴尔虎右旗| 和顺县| 黎城县| 康定县| 荆州市| 那坡县| 弋阳县| 科技|