男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

A landmark individual income tax reform

By Yang Zhiyong | China Daily | Updated: 2017-05-19 07:01
Share
Share - WeChat

MA XUEJING/CHINA DAILY

The pilot tax policy for deductable commercial health insurance products will be extended to the entire country on July 1. This pilot program for individual income tax was first implemented in 31 cities, including Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin and Chongqing in 2016. According to the pilot, the amount paid to purchase health insurance products will be deducted from a person's taxable income before levying individual income tax (IIT) if it does not exceed 2,400 yuan ($347.76) a year.

The extension of the pilot across the country, along with the recent establishment of a separate IIT department by the Ministry of Finance, marks remarkable progress in overall tax reform.

Last year, IIT revenue exceeded 1 trillion yuan, accounting for almost 8 percent of China's total tax revenue, and it is expected to play an even more important role in the overall taxation system, with IIT reform set to be expedited.

Since IIT is a direct tax, taxpayers see it as a big burden. In this regard, the deduction of the amount paid as health insurance premium from the taxable income will bring some relief to taxpayers.

Under the current taxation system, taxpayers have to pay different rates of individual taxes because their incomes are classified differently, which many consider unfair. With the improvement in the tax collection system and capacity, an IIT mechanism that combines comprehensive and classified taxation systems is likely to be gradually introduced.

Comprehensive tax collection, however, should first focus on income from salary and labor renumeration, and then expand to other kinds of individual incomes. When levying IIT, the tax authorities should consider not only an individual's income but also their actual economic burden. That is to say, individuals should pay IIT based not on their total incomes, but on the amount left after deducting their expenditure on certain essentials.

Although the classified IIT system, to a certain extent, deducts such costs from the taxable income, it fails to sufficiently consider the actual burden of taxpayers-the cost of healthcare and children's education for instance. Household expenditures, such as the costs of taking care of the elderly and raising children, should also be deducted from individuals' taxable incomes. The tax authorities should consider these aspects while deepening IIT reform.

Besides, the government should also consider reducing the tax rates to sharpen its global competitive edge and attract international talent to China. According to the current taxation system, individuals whose monthly wage is 80,000 yuan or more have to pay 45 percent of their incomes as IIT, which is more than they pay in many other economies. Since the top professionals in sectors such as information and communications technology, and finance can easily receive a wage of more than 80,000 yuan a month, they are reluctant to move to China and part with almost half their salaries to pay IIT.

Many say individuals earning more than 120,000 yuan a year in China belong to the high-income group. Judging by data on income distribution in the country, this view seems reasonable. But the so-called high-income group in China, given that the national economy is still growing at a relatively fast pace and more Chinese people are coming into wealth, may very soon be regarded as the "middle-income group".

Levying heavy taxes on this "not-so-rich" group could actually undermine social development. And not only this "middle-income group" but also the low-income group deserve to get tax reductions.

Therefore, while deepening the IIT reform, which combines comprehensive and classified taxation systems, the tax authorities should consider reducing the tax rate and granting more deductions to taxpayers to support the middle-income group as a way of promoting social harmony.

The author is a research fellow at the National Academy of Economic Strategy, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 县级市| 台江县| 建始县| 安多县| 秦安县| 台东市| 越西县| 崇左市| 昭觉县| 双峰县| 定兴县| 都兰县| 周宁县| 礼泉县| 张掖市| 海伦市| 永济市| 张家口市| 张家港市| 新源县| 千阳县| 金门县| 苍溪县| 沭阳县| 马龙县| 高平市| 阿克陶县| 饶平县| 永州市| 比如县| 隆化县| 玉树县| 右玉县| 边坝县| 龙山县| 永和县| 页游| 遂宁市| 抚松县| 大同县| 富宁县| 山东| 桦甸市| 石渠县| 宽城| 南陵县| 安乡县| 台江县| 海南省| 临江市| 盐城市| 阿拉善左旗| 马公市| 云浮市| 道孚县| 泸定县| 贵港市| 宜丰县| 德江县| 邵东县| 高安市| 营口市| 海口市| 玉门市| 金湖县| 景德镇市| 邻水| 桓台县| 高邑县| 和林格尔县| 牙克石市| 缙云县| 克东县| 聂荣县| 高州市| 张家界市| 二连浩特市| 桐城市| 横峰县| 宜州市| 石泉县| 梨树县|