男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / From the Press

With AI, best choice is cooperation

By Sun Chenghao and Zhao Yuqi | chinausfocus.com | Updated: 2023-03-01 10:36
Share
Share - WeChat
Teachers are seen behind a laptop during a workshop on the ChatGPT bot organized by a media service school in Geneva, Switzerland, on Feb 1. [PHOTO/AFP]

From Feb 15 to 16, more than 60 countries, including China and the United States, signed a modest call to action endorsing the responsible use of artificial intelligence in the military — a valuable consensus for security governance.

In recent years, with the rapid development of AI, various ethical and security governance issues have emerged, and it has become urgent for countries to promote the responsible use of this technology through joint efforts.

As important players in the field, China and the US are essential leaders in its development and application. However, America's full-spectrum strategic competition toward China continues to deepen, with escalating unilateral sanctions. The US also introduced the bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act of 2022, which squeezes China's access to necessary resources related to AI technology. In this context, transcending political differences and focusing on the research, development and application of AI technology are the most significant issues for China and the US to take into consideration. If both countries would promote "AI for good," then the technology could present an opportunity for cooperation rather than being just another competitive flashpoint in bilateral relations.

Currently, both China and the US are thriving in the field of AI. In terms of top-level design, both countries strongly support AI as an emerging strategic industry and have laid out national strategic plans. In the industrial chain, the US has the most AI companies and access to the largest volume of financing in the world. US companies cover all aspects of the industrial chain, especially the basic and technical layers.

In terms of application, the two countries have different focal points. US companies concern themselves more with machine learning, speech recognition and synthesis, while Chinese companies focus more on online payments, image processing and intelligent searches.

Taking the basic information about AI development in both countries, three areas of cooperation are possible in the next phase — ethics and security governance, regulatory principles and common standards and talent training and exchange.

First, China and the US have already taken the first step toward cooperation on the "responsible use of AI in the military" and should continue to expand the basis for cooperation. The popularity of AI and automated decision-making techniques may magnify the inherent biases of designers, generating misunderstandings and miscalculations. Discriminatory algorithms, if not properly addressed, can lead to the infringement of human rights and equality, such as algorithmic discrimination, data privacy breaches and technological poverty.

Take the recent chatbot ChatGPT as an example. It is a generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) and part of the Natural Language Processing (NLP) segment of the technology layer. It can automatically generate answers by mimicking human chatting behavior. Its inception marks a new stage in text-based AI but also ushers in a great deal of controversy. In this case, China and the US should actively guide and manage domestic companies to avoid ethical issues in AI applications. It's better to strengthen communication and promote international consensus. Advocating vicious competition in the abuse or misuse of AI is unwise.

Second, China and the US should play a leading and exemplary role in strengthening international cooperation and in promoting regulatory principles and common standards to ensure the safe application of AI. Along with the deep integration of AI with various industries, its future development depends not only on technical break-throughs but also on dealing with derived legal and institutional problems, such as deployment security, developer obligations and rights, end-user rights and development standards. Additionally, in the process of acquisition, storage, analysis, reproduction and dissemination of data, privacy issues could become a time bomb if rules and institutions are not set.

Third, China and the US should gradually resume and expand talent training and exchanges. With the removal of travel restrictions, the pandemic is no longer a barrier to people-to-people exchanges, so it is a general trend to resume and expand talent exchanges. The Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2022 released by Stanford University shows that the number of cooperative publications between China and the US in AI increased by a factor of five from 2010 to 2021, ranking top in the world.

The US, however, is currently unilaterally advocating strategic competition with China, playing up the "China threat" in news coverage and rarely mentioning China-US scientific cooperation. It seems that the narrative of great power competition is likely to lead to stress, while details of cooperation are being overlooked. If these hints of cooperation are ignored, then AI will become another gladiatorial arena rather than a point of cooperation in bilateral relations in the future.

In November 2022, China issued a position paper on strengthening the ethical governance of AI, stating that it had long been committed to building a community of human destiny in the field. It has actively advocated the "people-oriented" and "technology for good" concepts. China also advocates better understanding of the ethical issues of AI globally and wants to ensure safe, reliable and controlled AI to better promote sustainable development and the common welfare of all humanity.

Therefore, the development of AI technology should focus on the technology itself, rather than becoming a victim of competition between major powers and a new battlefield. Otherwise, AI will not help mankind much.

It is one-sided to define the China-US relationship in AI only in terms of competitive status. In specific applications such as retail, finance, manufacturing, self-driving cars and telemedicine, the two countries can form a cooperative, win-win relationship. Under a standardized operating system, companies in both countries could share and access more data and work together to develop larger markets, amplifying comparative advantages, facilitating the formation of a circular economy and ultimately leading to lower costs and greater efficiency.

Sun Chenghao is fellow of Center for International Security and Strategy at Tsinghua University and Zhao Yuqi is research assistant of US-Europe Program of Center for International Security and Strategy at Tsinghua University.

The article was first published on chinausfocus on Feb 28, 2023.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 闵行区| 东丰县| 哈尔滨市| 山阴县| 邹平县| 泸溪县| 忻城县| 漳平市| 平定县| 巴东县| 汶川县| 洛阳市| 将乐县| 荃湾区| 镇平县| 新余市| 虞城县| 宜春市| 嘉定区| 八宿县| 通河县| 昌乐县| 温宿县| 日照市| 葵青区| 长兴县| 鄂州市| 忻城县| 泾阳县| 开鲁县| 岱山县| 尼勒克县| 疏勒县| 西林县| 九寨沟县| 河北省| 治县。| 积石山| 建宁县| 嘉义市| 营口市| 衡阳县| 望城县| 株洲市| 英山县| 双峰县| 定安县| 湾仔区| 龙州县| 沅陵县| 普洱| 白河县| 长寿区| 泰州市| 梅河口市| 吉隆县| 临湘市| 仪陇县| 翁牛特旗| 黄冈市| 东兰县| 加查县| 二手房| 都匀市| 甘德县| 五家渠市| 安康市| 兰西县| 盐津县| 新密市| 扶绥县| 双城市| 建始县| 道真| 门头沟区| 鹤庆县| 麻江县| 名山县| 肥西县| 北宁市| 深泽县| 宁海县|