男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Global Views

A new security concern on the horizon

By ONG TEE KEAT | China Daily Global | Updated: 2023-05-16 08:07
Share
Share - WeChat

JIN DING/CHINA DAILY


The roll-out of the Global Development Initiative and Global Security Initiative by China provides a timely framework for the ASEAN-China collaboration in agricultural development and food security

In the years preceding the COVID-19 pandemic, food security was on the back burner for most member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations amid robust GDP growth brought about by globalization.

While the region was still in the throes of COVID-19, the size of the hungry population teetering on the brink of malnutrition and famine worldwide witnessed a sharp rise to 258 million people in 2022 from 193 million the year before. The ASEAN region was not spared the exigency either. More than 60 million people remain undernourished in the region that was once dubbed the most dynamic regional bloc in the world.

The cost of food imports and agricultural production soared to a record high when wheat and fertilizer exports were disrupted after the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict in February 2022. Alongside the economic fallout, the vulnerable food security stands out as a clear regional concern and a policy priority.

Parallel to this, the protectionist export bans on certain food items within the region ring the alarm of "food nationalism" which some countries justify by citing "prioritizing self-sufficiency". Nonetheless, the latter is no answer to the exigency. Instead, it would only put regional integration to the test.

While the agricultural output in ASEAN is becoming increasingly unsustainable to feed its ever-growing population, marine resources are getting depleted at an unprecedented rate because of escalating unregulated overfishing in the region.

Against such a backdrop, not only is the ASEAN-China Year of Agricultural Development and Food Security Cooperation a timely and relevant initiative in response to the exigency, more importantly, it calls for international solidarity and concerted action to arrest the woes amid the declining confidence.

Indeed, this is a new dimension of collaboration in the domain of non-traditional security concerns where ASEAN has yet to have a coherent and coordinated security architecture. Neither is it an easy feat at a time when the trust deficit is riding high worldwide and global collaboration is getting more fragmented than ever before along geopolitical lines.

Unlike the traditional security interests where antagonistic military might and competing security pacts dominate the scene, non-traditional security exigencies see the emergence of insecurity in such key areas as food, energy and climate change. And the only key to addressing such regional or global woes lies in coordinated efforts and collective wisdom through multilateral collaboration, instead of antagonistic face-off.

In the face of mounting pressure of food insecurity, ASEAN is in dire need of capacity building in stabilizing its collective food supply chain. In this respect, all efforts in addressing the formidable challenges posed by climate change as well as agricultural output in the region are inseparable from technological empowerment.

Facilities of logistical connectivity, storage and refrigeration are absolutely necessary to make the remedial efforts viable. All these constitute the new drivers of economic growth in the region that may require the injection of Chinese capital and experience.

The roll-out of the Global Development Initiative and Global Security Initiative by China provides a timely framework for ASEAN-China collaboration in agricultural development and food security. Both the China-proposed initiatives, consistent with the United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda, are anticipated to fulfill the regional bloc's dire need for "empowerment" through capacity building.

Prior to this, Beijing's partnership diplomacy was largely economy-driven. Security hardly ever took the driver's seat although China is the second largest funds-provider for the UN peacekeeping missions, in addition to deploying the most number of peacekeeping troops among permanent members of the UN Security Council.

In the current context, the international community has to live with the new paradigm of security concern where antagonism in the zero-sum perspective is no solution to the prevailing conundrums. Food insecurity in ASEAN is a case in point. It is now taken cognizance of as a critical pillar of regional security against a challenging backdrop where it's also a strategic guarantee of global peace and development.

From the perspective of regional geopolitical dynamics, the success of ASEAN-China collaboration in addressing such a grave challenge will no doubt add another feather to Beijing's cap of comprehensive strategic partnership with its Southeast Asian neighbor.

This enabler's role, consistent with the ideal of forging a community with a shared future for humanity, is all set to enrich the prevailing bleak scenario of global governance with a refreshing element of symbiotic collaboration in the real sense.

The author is chairman of the Belt and Road Initiative Caucus for the Asia-Pacific and a senior fellow of the Taihe Institute, China. The author contributed this article to China Watch, a think tank powered by China Daily. The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

Contact the editor at editor@chinawatch.cn

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 宝兴县| 梅河口市| 临夏市| 微山县| 图木舒克市| 青铜峡市| 许昌县| 芒康县| 临颍县| 宾阳县| 揭阳市| 明溪县| 荥经县| 喀喇沁旗| 阿拉尔市| 和林格尔县| 千阳县| 苏尼特右旗| 宜宾县| 阜康市| 伊通| 甘肃省| 万州区| 阿巴嘎旗| 都安| 西林县| 裕民县| 江油市| 盘锦市| 稻城县| 崇信县| 海盐县| 南充市| 嵩明县| 公安县| 县级市| 南溪县| 南雄市| 顺昌县| 申扎县| 渑池县| 桓仁| 马龙县| 平塘县| 岢岚县| 浦江县| 平陆县| 连山| 石河子市| 疏附县| 会理县| 陆川县| 靖安县| 宁陕县| 高青县| 永德县| 汕头市| 常州市| 板桥市| 教育| 台前县| 康定县| 武定县| 武平县| 赣州市| 高青县| 上林县| 达拉特旗| 台东市| 孟村| 明溪县| 石柱| 于都县| 油尖旺区| 南昌市| 绥阳县| 广灵县| 黄骅市| 汝南县| 上犹县| 乐昌市| 鄂伦春自治旗|