男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / From the Press

Hegemonic program that violates international law

China Daily | Updated: 2023-06-27 07:48
Share
Share - WeChat
SONG CHEN/CHINA DAILY

Freedom of navigation on the high seas is a long-established principle of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. However, for the United States, which is not a signatory to the UNCLOS, it is merely an excuse to exercise its hegemony.

In 1979, the US introduced the so-called Freedom of Navigation Program, the goal of which is to challenge other countries' "excessive maritime claims" unilaterally identified by the US. Although the program also includes diplomatic actions, its central feature is the use of armed forces, such as warships or aircraft, to directly challenge other countries' claims at sea.

The US released its first annual report on its Freedom of Navigation Program in 1991. Since then, it has issued 30 such reports. According to the reports, it has conducted more than 600"freedom of navigation operations" against more than 60 countries, mainly developing countries, such as Iran, Cambodia, China and Myanmar.

As an international legal instrument regulating maritime areas and maritime activities, the UNCLOS matches the interests of states in freedom of navigation with the sovereignty and jurisdiction of coastal states. On the basis of respecting the sovereignty and jurisdiction of coastal states, it has designed navigation regimes in different waters to achieve a delicate balance between the rights and interests of states.

The US' Freedom of Navigation Program not only runs counter to the relevant provisions of the UNCLOS, but also violates the purposes and principles of the UN Charter. It is a blatant "double standard" in the face of international law.

Even on the high seas, the parties exercising freedom of navigation should abide by the rules to ensure they are not causing trouble to countries nearby, according to the UNCLOS. However, as the US' Freedom of Navigation Program indicates, what it seeks is "absolute freedom" without any restrictions. The US' practices are nothing but a hegemonic act that puts the US' "family rules" above the universally recognized international law of the sea.

In essence, the US actions under the program represent its attempts to challenge the international law of the sea regime established by the UNCLOS. By doing so, it also seeks to impose its own will on the 169 parties to the Convention.

This once again exposes the habitual trick of the US, which is to tamper with international rules through its own standards and self-interpretation of international laws, aiming to maintain its hegemonic status in the sea.

All peace-loving countries have a common interest in maintaining the order of the international law of the sea, and they should unite to oppose the so-called freedom of navigation program of the US.

- CHINA.COM.CN

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 师宗县| 渑池县| 东乡县| 临沧市| 红原县| 广德县| 盘山县| 纳雍县| 外汇| 濮阳市| 安庆市| 错那县| 公安县| 静宁县| 湖口县| 巴东县| 吉水县| 青铜峡市| 武安市| 荃湾区| 玛纳斯县| 荔波县| 夏邑县| 滨州市| 平武县| 寻甸| 历史| 镶黄旗| 涪陵区| 正定县| 定襄县| 宁化县| 泰和县| 甘孜| 杂多县| 东阳市| 柯坪县| 稻城县| 漳平市| 卓资县| 兴国县| 墨玉县| 丰原市| 鱼台县| 台北市| 翁牛特旗| 西丰县| 敦化市| 商城县| 年辖:市辖区| 满洲里市| 蛟河市| 泾阳县| 漳州市| 江安县| 蕲春县| 尚志市| 隆德县| 颍上县| 湘潭市| 布尔津县| 池州市| 武宁县| 呼玛县| 依兰县| 巴里| 莲花县| 丹棱县| 舞钢市| 辉南县| 稷山县| 灌阳县| 洮南市| 昌吉市| 北票市| 沾益县| 屏东县| 阜新市| 信阳市| 锦州市| 亚东县| 莱芜市|