男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Editorials

Look behind promotions

(China Daily) Updated: 2014-09-25 07:41

So, Liu Tienan, the disgraced former chief of the National Energy Administration and deputy director of the National Development and Reform Commission, is not one of a kind.

Like the rise and fall of many other corrupt officials caught in the past, Liu's upward trajectory of decay was coupled with corruption.

The indictment shows that between 2002 and 2012, Liu took almost $6 million in bribes for behind-the-scenes brokering on behalf of corporate interests. In return, he and his family received a car, a villa, cash, and company shares.

Considering the bargaining chips in his hands - the authority to make or break a local industry or company or project, as well as the prevalence and rampancy of rent-seeking in Chinese officialdom - $6 million really isn't that big a deal for a man in his position. At least that is what many might choose to believe.

Indeed, corruption on this scale hardly raises an eyebrow these days. Especially after the shocking revelations that officials with much less administrative authority have embezzled much more.

More importantly, since his corruption has been brought into the daylight and the court proceedings have been broadcast live, the only suspense appears to be how many years Liu will get behind the bars.

Everything might seem to be done and dusted then, aside from the sentence, when justice will finally be done.

However, since Liu, as is true of all other corrupt officials, committed his offenses as he rose through the ranks and the offices of power, there is a lot more to his case. And one significant aspect that has persistently been left aside should no longer be.

It is embarrassing to even acknowledge that Liu and many others who have been caught in the anti-corruption net were repeatedly promoted to higher offices while each time abusing the power they had in hand.

Even from the perspective of plugging possible holes in the system of official appointments, the authorities should conduct careful reflection and examinations.

Everyone knows where to begin with: Who were behind Liu's promotions? And why?

Theoretically, the Communist Party of China's organizational authorities have strict rules and procedure for official appointments. Appointments are supposed to be both "scientific" and "democratic". What went wrong in the case of Liu and others like him? And is anyone responsible?

These shouldn't forever be mysteries. They are not just intra-Party affairs.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 乌兰县| 旺苍县| 拉萨市| 仁布县| 林西县| 平武县| 北宁市| 广东省| 祁连县| 丹寨县| 沁水县| 宜丰县| 宜宾市| 青铜峡市| 炎陵县| 崇礼县| 军事| 西吉县| 南和县| 蓝田县| 昌乐县| 嘉黎县| 普陀区| 韩城市| 伊春市| 大埔区| 夏邑县| 桂阳县| 南开区| 宁武县| 辽宁省| 娄底市| 临沭县| 庄河市| 会同县| 沁水县| 安丘市| 河东区| 仙桃市| 奉贤区| 嵩明县| 博客| 卢湾区| 巩义市| 陆丰市| 百色市| 旬阳县| 马关县| 琼结县| 芦山县| 偏关县| 剑阁县| 湖州市| 南康市| 集安市| 黔西县| 石台县| 申扎县| 新建县| 九龙城区| 崇州市| 阿克苏市| 三门县| 夏津县| 衡南县| 元谋县| 廊坊市| 定日县| 佛冈县| 德化县| 涿州市| 江永县| 喀喇沁旗| 芒康县| 通化县| 江孜县| 和龙市| 桃江县| 武汉市| 深圳市| 海南省| 滨州市|